Vertical job search engines - the list

Vertical job search engines have hit the job board world like a tornado - in the recruiting blogs, I've seen heated discussion about the future of job search verticals (also known variously as job aggregators and job metasearch sites) but this is the only list that I am aware of.

First, the top 10 (North American) and traffic graphs from compete.com for the top five  top-five vertical job search engine bottom five  top-five vertical job search engine and for comparison's sake a Google trends graph for the top five and bottom five:

  1. indeed.com
  2. simplyhired.com
  3. topusajobs.com
  4. job-search-engine.com
  5. gojobs.com
  6. careerjet.com
  7. jobalot.com
  8. getthejob.com
  9. diversityjobs.com
  10. wowjobs.ca

And here is the comprehensive list:

Americas

Asia

Europe

Now, more of these sites are surely on the way. So, we're moving closer and closer to a situation in which the same jobs are available on every job board. Who wins in that case -- the team with the best interface and results? The team with the best marketing? Will one company dominate in both areas? Who do you think it will be?

Or maybe when the venture capital money is gone, the largest sites will fold and the leanest of the bootstrappers will carry the torch. There's an interesting discussion about the viability of vertical search at Talentism.

My own belief? You can count on more than one long-run winner from this bunch - perhaps one or two of the generalist boards and a number of niche verticals similar to DiversityJobs.com. Who's your money on?



I wrote some articles last year regarding this, addressing some of the issue on my blog-

Monster vs Vertical Search
http://trueloveofcoffee.com/technicaldisaster/?p=16

Copyright “Fair Use”- Is stealing jobs accepted?
http://trueloveofcoffee.com/technicaldisaster/?p=20

There are a lot of questions that this stuff begs us to ask... and I don't know if an answer has ever really been given. When I approached the topic earlier, a few comments arose and then everyone just quietly looked the other way.

October 5, 2006 - 6:39pm

Eric,
Here are some of my thoughts...
Employment Vertical Search Engines (VSE)- Who do they compete against for job seeker eyeballs???

Corporate Employment websites... Possibly, if the job seeker knows exactly who they want to work for... but then again, if that was the case, they wouldn't be on a Vertical Search Engine, or a Monster... they would have just typed in Ibm.com, and browsed to the career center... so I guess they aren't competitors.

What about Niche Job Boards?
Niche job boards focus their marketing efforts on their niche. They also use SEO and SEM and VSEs to further market to their members and association members. As Peter Weddle, http://weddles.com, often demostrates, many of the Niche job boards are often Professional Associations, whose websites contain lots of content for the Passive Job seeker.

My view is that truly effective niche job boards are effective because they are part of the day-to-day life of the passive job seeker. The passive job seeker isn't going Indeed or SimplyHired on a daily basis, weekly, or monthly basis, as part of their day-to-day processes. However, if you are an HR Manager, you might be visiting SHRM.org every couple of weeks... and while your there you get the thought... "Oh yeah, I hate my boss... I wonder who is hiring?"
... So Vertical Search Engines don't compete against Niche Boards...

What about the Big 3?
Let's look at the short-term results... Vertical Search Engines (VSE), every job board seems to be posting content there. I would bet that Monster and CareerBuilder are seeing a big drop in the cost of job seeker acquisition. In the short-run the Big 3, might be loving it... lots of profit. They have a lot more job postings than individual companies, or most niche job boards. So, the Big 3 are getting lots of Free job seeker traffic from the VSEs, at little to know cost.... which means reducing the cost of acquisition and therefore, short-term profits.

What about Long-term...
Well, the cost of job seeker acquisition would normally be dropping, because the VSEs don't really charge at this time. At the same time, the number of candidates responding to jobs should be increasing, because the corporate job postings are being seen by more people.

So, what does this mean? More resumes. More unqualified candidates... This also means, more work for the recruiting departments, sifting through the ATS searches, the piles of resumes, etc.

The immediate short-term winner... Applicant Tracking Software Companies.

Come on... It has to affect the Big 3 somehow... Well companies might realize they can purchase the job seeker leads through a different mechanism, ie PPC, or through lower cost aggregators who ships all the content to the same VSEs. If this is the case, the companies will spend less with Monster and CareerBuilder. I don't see this happening for a lot of reasons. One thing the HR Market constantly forgets about is this... It's Easy to purchase and recruit with Monster and CareerBuilder.

You can't get fired for doing it. It's low risk! It's HR favorite buying decision. They have big sales teams and big support teams, and although lots of people want to complain about their results... THEY WORK... (not for all positions, etc, but they do work).

October 5, 2006 - 10:27pm

I cringe as I write this, because I'm a principal of a "horizontal" job search engine myself - www.insourced.com - but it's fairly clear to me that the "vertical space" within the job search space (for those keeping score, that's a "space within a space") is the future. Not that Monster, CareerBuilder, et al are going away, but the verticals are the sites that will chip away at them, I believe. There are many reasons for this, but among them I would say are: 1) Verticals can focus their content much better - "Laser focus" it, if you will, so they can naturally create content, aside from their jobs, that is more interesting to their core users. 2) They don't have to be all things to all people with their jobs, so quality of jobs is more likely, or at least more easily attainable. 3) They will likely get loyal followings, especially within the IT/tech industry, where techies are quick to reject the behemoths and move onto smaller, "better" options.
March 22, 2008 - 11:36am
Hugo Gill - JobsinHubs.com

JobsinHubs.com is a top quality job search site for English speaking professionals seeking employment in mainland Europe. Visit the site at www.JobsinHubs.com

** ejs ** well done Hugo, nice use of top quality domains!

April 15, 2008 - 1:24pm

Hi, we recently launched a vertical search engine in the UK and have just become the largest UK job search site. www.workhound.co.uk is the site and it would be great to be included in your list. Thanks, Bill www.workhound.co.uk
May 20, 2008 - 3:51pm

You might like to add www.tolmol.com in Asia. Currently the site provides vertical search services for products (comparison shopping) and jobs in India.
May 28, 2008 - 7:17pm
Emily Kovak - Hello, We have looked

Hello, We have looked through your site and noticed that you have a jobs related section in which several sites were listed. http://internetinc.com/comment/reply/29 We would also like to recommend our site http://www.careerjet.hk. Careerjet is an employment search engine specially for Hong Kong. It allows you to search a growing selection of jobs listed on company sites as well as jobsites in one go saving you the trouble of having to go to each site individually. We hope this site will interest you and can be included in your listings. Maybe some of our tools might be of interest to you: JobBox at http://www.careerjet.hk/partners/jobbox.html SearchBox at http://www.careerjet.hk/partners/searchbox.html Thank you. Kind regards, Emily Kovak emily@careerjet.hk
May 29, 2008 - 8:28am

today, I updated the vertical job search engine list with a top 10 ranking and compete.com graphs.

June 3, 2008 - 11:29am

Thanks Eric for such an exhaustive list. We have just recently launched our job search engine, http://www.jobbind.com . We are different from the others by the following two points: 1. We only collect jobs from the employers websites. Therefore, we guarantee both quality and direct link between the job seeker and the hiring company. We totally avoid job boards, ads, newspapers, and such. 2. We provide job searching services in more than 100 countries.

Although most of our content currently is focused in US, Canada, UK, China, and India, but we are working on expanding the content in other countries as well. I would appreciate if you can add www.jobbind.com to your exhaustive list. Thanks, Susan N

** es ** impressive site Susan, congratulations!

June 29, 2008 - 10:32am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
login